🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.